What Is A Adjectival Agreement

In nomine sentences, the adjectives do not show a match with the noun, although pronouns do. z.B. a szép k-nyveitekkel “with your beautiful books” (“szép”: nice): the suffixes of the plural, the possessive “your” and the fall marking “with” are marked only on the name. 6But Moravcsik, it is possible that a sex voter agrees with a nominative sentence that has a gender affix (as in the Nomen tawba) whereas this component has no insurmountable sexual marker (as in the adjective na) and therefore does not present a correspondence with the name. Another possible match pattern is that the voter who agrees with Nostun has another sexual marker (Moravcsik 1978, p. 337). For example, ayy`man ma`d`d`datan (Q 2:80) “numbered days”, where the noun is masculine in the plural and the adjective has the female singular. As can be seen, the presence of a novel sexual marker on Nostunon cannot be necessary or sufficient to ensure a gender match for all components that could agree in principle (Moravcsik 1978, p. 342).

Moreover, it is not generally true that a single name will always agree with a singular component or that a pluralistic noun will always agree with plural voters (Moravcsik 1978, p. 343). As an example of such a structure, Moravcsik mentions that in modern Arabic, a pluralistic subject can accept either the singular or the plural agreement (Moravcsik 1978, p. 346). At the beginning of modern times, there was an agreement for the second person, which singularus all the verbs in the current form, as well as in the past some usual verbs. It was usually in the shape-east, but -st and t also occurred. Note that this does not affect endings for other people and numbers. There is also unanimity in the number. For example: Vitabu viwili vitatosha (Two books will suffice), Michungwa miwili itatosha (Two orange trees will suffice), Machungwa mawili yatatosha (Two oranges will suffice). A rare type of arrangement that phonologically copies parts of the head instead of agreeing with a grammatical category. [4] For example, in Bainouk: In Hungarian, verbs have a polypersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (precision). There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all.

(Adverbs have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I love someone or something indeterminate), szeretem (I love him, she, or her, or her, specifically), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, me, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, her or her especially). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is agreement between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often refers more or less precisely to the person). 4In the example of raulunamun, A (the noun) and B (the adjective) are called “approval ingredients.” The constituent B1 is the adjective, -fin, z.B.`t, -`na or no terminality for the male singular called “agreement marker.” In terms of number, person, destination and case mark, this is called “agreement characteristics.” Thus karénun (B) in Arabic agrees with raulun (A) because there is a relationship of covariance between the number, the person, the indeterminate and the indications of the case mark of the adjective and between the phonological form of the adjective, i.e. it has no end, is indeterminate and in the nominative case.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.